Thursday 23 March 2017

Rewatching Woody Allen: Hannah and her sisters





Whenever I have gone back repeatedly to Woody Allen's films it has been mostly among Annie Hall, Manhattan, Vicky Christina Barcelona and Midnight in Paris. Although Hannah and her sisters is Allen's one of the most acclaimed works I never went back to it and after rewatching it after a long time I cannot seem to remember why, maybe it didn't affect me so strongly when I watched it for the first time. I have to confess I watched this in my early years of film watching and maybe I couldn't connect to the dilemmas of adult life as shown in the movie.

This film is really about all the problems and complexities adult life throws at you and how all of us in our imperfect yet humane ways deal with them. The movie is about how Hannah's sisters grow with time and how Hannah (Mia Farrow) plays an indirect role in both of their gradual growth. The movie starts and ends with a thanksgiving dinner. Between these two dinners, Hannah hasn't changed much but the change that Lee (Barbara Hershey) and Holly (Dianne Wiest) undergoes portrays Hannah in a slightly unsympathetic light. Woody Allen in most of his movies has caricatured the "intellectual". But in this movie using the nuances of sibling rivalries he shows how the unintentional follies of the intellectual or the successful one allows the other people surrounding her to break out of their shells.

The story of Elliot (Michael Caine), Hannah's husband and Lee is so fallible and yet so touching that you symapthise with both of them. Elliot is completely smitten by Lee at the first thanksgiving and Lee is also aware of it. They have a passionate affair for a year but completely ridden with guilt.  
This affair allows Lee to get out of a toxic relationship she has with Frederick (Max von Sydow),  an older artist who once was Lee's teacher. When Lee leaves Frederick he says, "What will I do? You are my only connection to the outer world.", Lee replies, "It's too much responsibility for me, it's not fair". This scene mocks the "intellectual" but the audience doesn't know whom to be sympathetic with. A perfect example of Allen's brilliant writing. Elliot and Lee also part ways when the guilt starts playing the bigger part. She moves on to a guilt-free relationship with another professor of hers' only to be a part of the similar and probably flawed relation. Micahel Caine's performance in this role for which he won an Oscar is absolutely flawless. His portrayal of the ineer struggles of Elliot is a delight to watch.

Woody Allen obviously reserves the most comic scenes for himself. He is Hannah's ex husband, a hypochondriac and terribly with disappointed with life. There's a line in Annie Hall where he says life can be divided into the horrible and the miserable. He follows a similar disenchanted view here too. After he survives a cancer scare he decides to leave everything as the meaninglessness of life dawns upon him more heavily.

                               

But as in most Allen movies, after all his futile efforts in the search of faith, the simplest of things makes him understand that how that we should enjoy the meaningless journey called life. Here he discovers it through a Groucho Marx movie, surely a delightful scene after his rants about the futility of being.

The movie's most drastic arc is Holly's transformation. She transforms from an inferiority-complex ridden cocaine addict to a succesful screenwriter who marries Woody Allen by the end of the movie. This ending shows how unpredictable life is as Hannah had try to hook up Allen and Holly and they ended up deriding each other after a terribly bitter evening. With Holly's character Allen shows how is the aboslute master when it comes to writing women characters. He shows how horrid and nauseating this woman can be at her most vulnerable times and how charming and loving she can be when someone acknowledges her efforts. Diane Wiest surely had her mark on this film with her powerful Oscar winning portrayal of Holly.

The story of Hannah, is about a woman who is too independent and around whom most people don't feel needed. She is an extremely kind person but her lack of need for emotional support from her relations makes it suffocating for the people around her and they end up resenting her. Allen shows how we want to be feel needed, we can never stay in a relation just because we admire the other person. This movie is a pinnacle in Allen's understanding and writing about brilliant women characters.  As with Annie in Annie Hall he shows how Holly and Lee are more charming because of their vulnerabilities, self-doubts and follies. To err is to human but to err and become charming is to women.

Friday 17 March 2017

Elle: walking on the borderline of absolute perversion



In one of his interviews, David Fincher says people are perverts and that this is the foundation of his career.  In the documentary The Pervert's Guide to Cinema, Slavoj Zizek interprets movies in a highly Freudian sense to show how directors have shown us the perverts in us by making us enjoy their work. Although I don't agree with Zizek everywhere in that documentary I feel every complex movie has to flirt with perversion in some sense or the other. There are very few movies which flirt with absolute perversion and I think Elle is one of them.

Elle is the story of how Michele LeBlanc (Isabelle Huppert), a succesful CEO of a gaming company  reacts when she is raped by an intruder in her house. The movie opens with this horrifyingly violent and detached rape scene which is being observed by her cat. The sexual grunts which her heard from the rapist and from Michelle are so close but yet so far that you are already sensing a tale of perversion by the first couple of minutes. She, being a part of the civil society, doesn't even get time to grieve. This is shown beautifully when she wipes off her vaginal blood during taking a bath after the incident. She tries to go ahead with her life in a normal way. She visits her mother who is shown to be quite voyeorus which Michelle despises. In this scene her mother tells her "you always have wanted a sanitised version of life". The main question of the film is has she wanted one or she has been forced into one? The cold way she discloses the rape story to her ex-husband and her friend Anna and her husband Robert at a dinner is characteristic of the inner struggles she is experiencing.

As the movie progresses, we find that Michelle's father is a murderer who murdered half of their neighbourhood when she was 9 and then burnt their house down. People have believed that Michelle have been complicit to her father's horrendous acts that night. She has lived with this identity and yet made a succesful life for herself. Her mistrust in police is understandable. In the meantime, the rapist sends sexual messages to her. Also a morphed video of her being sodomised by a computer monster of her game is realeased in her office. All these incidents make her try to hunt down the rapist.

Meanwhile, she has been sleeping with her Anna's husband which she wants to stop as she is attracted to her next door banker neighbour Patrick. There is a beautifully crafted Hitchcockian scene where Michelle masturbates to Patrick while spying on him with a binocular as he sets up the nativity scene for his religious wife. Michelle eventually tries to seduce Patrick while she invites everybody for a Christmas eve dinner. Michelle's mother dies during the dinner and she finally visits her father in prison. But her father commits suicide after knowing that Michelle would be visiting. This event shockingly makes Michelle happy as she whispers to the the dead body that she killed him by visiting.

The movie explores many perverted and dystopian scenarios in the life of this woman and how she reacts to them. Some of her reactions are utterly perverted and disturbing but we have to remember that this is a women with extremely troubled past. If you haven't seen the movie I would urge you to stop here and comeback for the rest of this. It's an extremely well balanced movie which flirts with abolute perversion but still presents us with a tale of suppressed feelings, latent sexual desires and utterly humane characters. Isabelle Huppert has given a performance of a lifetime. She has explored all the nuances and struggles of this character in an utterly elegant fashion.


SPOILERS AHEAD


Michelle is attacked again and she in this violent encounter she founds out that  Patrick is her assaulter. When asked why he did it he says it was necessary. The most sickening twist of the movie is when we find out that Michelle starts an abusive affair with Patrick. The film leaves the audience to decide whether she cannot help being in this abusive affair or it is her bigger ploy to get revenge upon Patrick. She joins the after party of her game launch with Patrick. While they return Michelle acknowledges that she feels what Patrick and she has is sick. Patrick is killed by Michelle's son when he finds Patrick assualting her. The movie gives us a desired ending but a conversation between Patrick's wife and Michelle reveals that she knew what was going on and she wanted Patrick to find whatever sexual satisfaction he was looking for.

The movie shows how we all are perverts inside but still humans. It wants to tell that you cannot judge a person harshly even if he is into heinous and devious acts. It wants to show us that with all these centuries of civilisation we may have been able to train ourselves according to expectations  of the civilised society but still there is an other side hidden inside all of us and everyone of us will find those demons if we look carefully enough. Elle asks us to question what does it mean to be civilised. Are we forbidden to access our most perverted desires and if we do access how do we do it? The answer is much more complicated than this beautifully made film.